Recent Posts

Pages: 1 ... 8 9 [10]
91
Windows Operating Systems / Re: Compatibility of Office 97 with XP?
« Last post by andrea on October 03, 2007, 07:40:43 PM »
And here I thought that the newer versions of Office could open any files
from the older versions, but not always vice versa.
I first bought Office 95 around 1996.
In 97, my brother ran a copy of office 97 on his computer, and when it
crashed, not having the original to be able to reinstall it, he grabbed my
95 CD and installed it. he quickly found out that 97 used files that 95
could not open.
I since use office 2000, and now office 2003, and have not found any files
that I could not open, except for a couple of very new files that may have
been created on an even later version of office.
It seems to be a matter of making newer versions change file types just
enough to make people upgrade when they should not need to.

I also have Star Office, supposed to run under Windows as well as Linux and
such.
I found the big drawback with it was that it could not find the #$^&***
printer....
have not tried it since.

Anyone know how compatible Office 97 is with XP? I know someone who
>> just installed it but they don't know if they can expect all the
>> features to play.
>>
>
> I installed both Office 97 and an early version of Microsoft Works for
> Windows, on XP, and they both ran fine.
>
> There are some incompatibility issues between Office 97 and later
> versions, though, so it is not a good choice if you want to use it to
> make files that will be distributed to other people.
>
> The reason I installed those earlier version, was for customer
> support... I had a client who owned some old files she could not open
> in a later version of Office.
92
Windows Operating Systems / Compatibility of Office 97 with XP?
« Last post by andrea on October 03, 2007, 07:39:20 PM »
I since use office 2000, and now office 2003, and have not found any
files that I could not open, except for a couple of very new files
that may have been created on an even later version of office.It seems
to be a matter of making newer versions change file types just enough
to make people upgrade when they should not need to.

I use Office 2007 and the features on it are in my opinion are better
and easier than any of previous versions. However, because it is still
new and not many people have it I have to save all my files down to 97
to 2003 which takes away from my features I get in 2007.
93
Drives & Removable Media / Fireware or USB 2.0 which is better?
« Last post by andrea on October 03, 2007, 07:32:54 PM »
I just saw that eSata has external hard drives which is what I'm looking to get. Now my Asus M2N-SLI Deluxe MOBO has one external port eSATA already and I saw one at newegg:

http://www.newegg. com/Product/ Product.aspx? Item=N82E1682214 8153

My question is eSATA still too new with many bugs or is it ready to be used everyday?

jh <jhlists@hirschman. net> wrote: Mike wrote:
>
>
> I'm curious on what is better USB 2.0 or fireware? Now I heard USB 2.0
> hits 400Mbps but what does fireware hit? My next question is what uses
> fireware, anything useful or is it more for corporations rather than
> home users?

USB 2.0 is 480 Mbps, but Firewire 400, also known as 1394a, running at
400 is faster in the real world for things like storage. There is also
1394b, also called Firewire by many, which typically runs at 800 Mbps.
Firewire also tends to use much less CPU.

Firewire is also still used for video apps - you can transfer video from
camcorders using it, and even grab video from some cable boxes using it.

Firewire is interesting because it has most of the advantages of SCSI
(and now SAS) without any of the hassles.

Firewire was always a consumer standard, and priced accordingly. I can't
think of a non-video app that would be corp-centric.

Despite the fact that it is superior for I/O, it was never designed for
things like mice and keyboards (although it does support printers and
scanners), which is probably one reason why USB won out. The other was
that Intel gave away USB for free, while Apple tried to get royalties
for Firewire until it became clear that the standard suffered. Apple has
dropped Firewire at this point - the first iPod was Firewire only, for
example.

Interestingly, I just bought two Firewire cards and a hub for the
princely sum of about $60. Two little used aspects of firewire:

* You can use it as networking standard, where it competes with gigabit
Ethernet. But, as GigE has gotten so cheap, it really doesn't work as a
cheap high-speed networking interconnect any longer. It was pretty
wonderful for "desktop networks" a few years ago.

* You can actually use it to physically connect multiple computers to a
single storage device! You need a shareable filesystem to make this work
- not common in the consumer world - but it can be made to work as a
"ghetto SAN".

That's why I just bought my gear - I want to try some DIY SAN stuff, and
the price is a lot cheaper than Fibre Channel. If I get things to work
with 1394, well, I'm going to be buying some pretty high-end gear after
that and using the same configs. Linux lets you do cool things like that :)

94
CPUs, Motherboards & RAM / What processor upgrades are possible?
« Last post by andrea on October 03, 2007, 07:30:41 PM »
> Would anyone care to advise on upgrade paths? I have an Intel Pentium
> 4 3.4 plugged into a TriGem Advent series motherboard. Socket 478.
>
> What processor upgrades are possible? Should I consider a motherboard
> upgrade?
>

You did not specify a model number, but looking at:

http://www.uktsuppo rt.co.uk/ advent/pc/ 3418.htm

...it appears that TriGem Advent 3418PC, uses an MSI mainboard, and
has a link to the MSI page in the 'Motherboard Info' section, pointing
to:

http://www.msi. com.tw/program/ products/ mainboard/ mbd/pro_mbd_ detail.php? UID=455

If this is not your specific model, a little poking around on the
website might unearth the information you seek, which should be
included in whatever downloadable manual and/or spec sheets, the
company offers.
Andrea
95
There may be additional power needed for the board, or the board batt.
is dead. Have you checked all the jumpers?

I am sure others here know more than I, but I believe any of this
could keep the board from doing anything, feel fre to correct me if I
am wrong.
 hope this helps
96
 Yes. I guess I misspoke myself. I didn't really want to know what
components are needed for a computer to post. I was trying to figure
out why my motherboard isn't making any noise when it is connected to
a power supply. I know that the power supply works and I was assured
 that the motherboard worked, but still I'm getting nothing.
97
General Hardware Chat / I am trying to put together a computer for a friend of mine
« Last post by andrea on October 03, 2007, 07:15:36 PM »
Hey everyone.
 I am trying to put together a computer for a friend of mine but
 its
been a long time since I tried to put a computer together. So
far I
 can't get the computer to do anything. I've got the motherboard
 with
cpu connected to the power supply but nothing happens. What am I
 missing? Do I have to have the whole computer together before
 something happens? I'm expecting to see fans going or something but
I'm getting nothing. who has some ideas?
98
General Hardware Chat / building my own pc ...where to start
« Last post by soni on September 22, 2007, 12:39:44 AM »
I know a little bit about computers ..... just the bare minimum
i know a bit about programs,scripts ect
but im wanting to get more familiar with harware so i decided to build my own pc
i will be building it over time and have 100 to get me starter.... but i dont know where to start
i thught the obviuos thing to do would be to buy a case first then when i buy the other compenits i can fit them to the case
would this be a good idea?
99
Introduce Yourself Here / Hi I am jason
« Last post by jason on September 02, 2007, 10:58:05 PM »
Hi I am jason and I am new to the forum pcorganise have been a good help to me and I always be around here.
Pages: 1 ... 8 9 [10]